contain  multitudes  •  por  Padma  Dorje  •  fundado  em  2003
contain  multitudes
Have you ever heard about the oculist conspiracy? No? Based on some recently decrypted documents, there appears to be an ultra secretive group of highly...YouTube

The Secret Society You've (Probably) Never Heard Of

Have you ever heard about the oculist conspiracy? No? Based on some recently decrypted documents, there appears to be an ultra secretive group of highly...
Would you believe that there is a conspiracy theory about the way we tune musical instruments? And that this theory even involves the Nazis, chakras, and whatnot? No? Then sit down and enjoy perhaps the most ridiculous conspiracy theory of all times.JAKUBMARIAN

The “432 Hz vs. 440 Hz” conspiracy theory

Would you believe that there is a conspiracy theory about the way we tune musical instruments? And that this theory even involves the Nazis, chakras, and whatnot? No? Then sit down and enjoy perhaps the most ridiculous conspiracy theory of all times.
Synchromysticism. // Apophenia, synchromysticism... the biggest element in a argumentative sale like this is repetition. You don't buy the first time they make the argument, but when they build over it, they repeat everything again -- when you re-watch the same images and “logic” again and again it is not the fact that you doubted it the first time that you mind fixes upon, but the fact that you remember it. You transform the working memory of an argument into rhetoric for it, the second time you know you already doubted it, then everything is “fair game” from then on... only that it isn't. That's how conspiracy theory works: infomercial repetition rhetoric + apophenia. // (Of course, this is an self-conscious ironic example. I recognize the artists behind this production are way smarter than simple charlatans or naive x-file style believers.)YouTube

Back To The Future predicts 9/11

Synchromysticism. // Apophenia, synchromysticism... the biggest element in a argumentative sale like this is repetition. You don't buy the first time they make the argument, but when they build over it, they repeat everything again -- when you re-watch the same images and “logic” again and again it is not the fact that you doubted it the first time that you mind fixes upon, but the fact that you remember it. You transform the working memory of an argument into rhetoric for it, the second time you know you already doubted it, then everything is “fair game” from then on... only that it isn't. That's how conspiracy theory works: infomercial repetition rhetoric + apophenia. // (Of course, this is an self-conscious ironic example. I recognize the artists behind this production are way smarter than simple charlatans or naive x-file style believers.)


Se você vê mérito nos tópicos tratados, divulgue — comente e partilhe nas redes sociais. É uma prática de generosidade que ajuda na minha própria prática de generosidade de produzir e disponibilizar esse conteúdo. Outras formas de ajudar.




Tigela de esmolas para contribuições.

Ajude tzal.org (contribuições mensais):

◦ PayPal, em qualquer valor acima de 10 reais

◦ Mercado pago, contribuição mensal de qualquer valor.


Para contribuição única:

◦ Pelo PIX

◦ PayPal

◦ Mercado Pago



Grupo de Whatasapp
(apenas anúncios)


todo conteúdo, design e programação por Eduardo Pinheiro, 2003-2024
(exceto onde esteja explicitamente indicado de outra forma)

Esta obra é licenciada em termos da CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Creative Commons. Atribuição. Não comercial. Sem derivações.



Por favor, quando divulgar algo deste site, evite copiar o conteúdo todo de um texto; escolha um trecho de um ou dois parágrafos e coloque um link. O material aqui é revisado constantemente, e páginas repetidas na internet perdem ranking perante os sites de busca (a sua e a minha).